Skills
Assignment Brief:
Task One:
Produce a detailed plan for the following essay question:
Outline and evaluate the role of judges, solicitors and barristers in the English legal system
Your plan should include section headings, main ideas and quotes you want to use.
Task Two:
Write an evaluation of eight sources you have used in the essay plan. Each evaluation must consider the following:
Author
Purpose
Reliability
Relevance
Your evaluations must include at least three books, and at least two academic journals
Secondary Research Level FE3 – It is expected that the Reference List will contain between five and ten sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include at least one academic book and one academic journal article.
Specific Assessment Criteria:
70-100 Work of Exceptional Quality
Virtually all of the relevant information/skills accurately deployed. Excellent and exceptional grasp of theoretical, conceptual, analytical and practical elements. Very effective integration of theory, practice and information in relation to the objectives of the assessment. There will be evidence of originality and creativity as appropriate to the subject.
60-69 Work of Very Good Quality
Most of the relevant information/skills accurately deployed. Good grasp of theoretical, conceptual, analytical, practical elements. Effective integration of theory, practice and information in relation to the objectives of the assessment.
50-59 Work of Good Quality
Some of the relevant information/skills accurately deployed. Adequate grasp of theoretical, conceptual, analytical and practical elements. Fair integration of theory, practice and information in relation to the objectives of the assessment.
40-49 Work of Satisfactory Quality
Some omissions in the deployment of information/ skills. Some grasp of theoretical, conceptual, analytical and practical elements. Limited integration of theory, practice and information in relation to the objectives of the assessment.
40 Borderline
Deficiencies or omissions in information, skills, theoretical, conceptual and practical elements. Limited integration of these in relation to the assessed work’s objectives. Some relevant content and marginal evidence of skills, knowledge or creativity which could, in the light of overall performance, constitute the basis for consideration for an overall pass grade at the examiners’ discretion.
Less than 40 Fail
Little evidence of the information, skills, theoretical, conceptual, analytical, creative or practical elements relevant to the assessment. Mainly irrelevant and/or incorrect information provided. Scant evidence of understanding of the requirements of the assessment.
Please also see Section 11 for General Assessment criteria in the module guide.
Submission Instructions:
See Section 11 Guidelines for the Preparation and Submission of written coursework, which will give you details on how to submit your work electronically. You are required to submit only electronic copies of your written assessments, unless your Module Tutor advises you otherwise.
Advice:
Do not cut and paste phrases or paragraphs from published sources. You should seek to use your own words to explain concepts and legal theory.
If you wish to refer to specific quotes from published sources then you must use full Oxford OSCOLA method of citation. See BISSTO for clear guidance.
Do not share work with other students.
Please follow the assingment instrutions adviced by
the tutor, Pls find attach all that have been advised by the Tutor.
1.
LO1: Produce plans and drafts which will enable meaningful development of ideas
LO2: Describe academic sources in terms of author, purpose, reliability and relevance
2.Your evaluations must include at least three books, and at least two academic journals
3.Note : In my submitted assignment plan, my Tutor Noted that my plan was ok, but i have not attempt using the Evaluate of Sources
Pls evaluate all sources used.
Assignment Number and Type: 001. Essay plan and evaluation of sources
Assignment Length: 1500
Produce a detailed plan for the following essay question:
Outline and evaluate the role of judges, solicitors and barristers in the English legal system
Your plan should include section headings, main ideas and quotes you want to use.
Task Two:
Write an evaluation of eight sources you have used in the essay plan. Each evaluation must consider the following:
BIOBLOGRAPHY OF THE AUTHOR SHOULD BE INCLUDED AS WELL.
Author
Purpose
Reliability
Relevance
Your evaluations must include at least three books, and at least two academic journals
Secondary Research Level FE3 – It is expected that the Reference List will contain between five and ten sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include at least one academic book and one academic journal article.
Submission Instructions:
See Section 11 Guidelines for the Preparation and Submission of written coursework, which will give you details on how to submit your work electronically. You are required to submit only electronic copies of your written assessments, unless your Module Tutor advises you otherwise.
Advice:
Do not cut and paste phrases or paragraphs from published sources. You should seek to use your own words to explain concepts and legal theory.
If you wish to refer to specific quotes from published sources then you must use full Oxford OSCOLA method of citation. See BISSTO for clear guidance.
Do not share work with other students.
VERY IMPORTANT PLS :
PLEASE NOTE, I HAVE ALREADY SUBMITTED THE FOLLOWING EBOOKS AND JOURNALS AS MY SUBMITTED ASSIGNMENT PLAN DURING 2 MONTHS AGO, IT WILL BE BETTER IF THESE THREE ( 3) OR TWO (2) REFERENCE SOURCES COULD BE ADDED TO MY FINAL ESSAY PLAN.
1. TITLE: English Legal System
Written By: Elliott,Catherin & Quinn, Frances
Published In: 2012/2013
EDITION:- Thirteenth Edition
Related Subjects:- Law>> Law of the United Kingdom and Ireland >>England and Wales
2. Title: English Legal System
Written By: Elliott, Catherine & Quinn, Frances
Published In: 2013/2014
Edition: Fourteenth Edition
Related Subject :Law>> Laww of the United Kingdom and Ireland >>England and Wales
3.Title: English Legal System
Our Service Charter
-
Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-Free
We employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers. -
Free Revisions
We keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed. -
Confidentiality / 100% No Disclosure
We make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service. -
Money Back Guarantee
If the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit. -
24/7 Customer Support
We have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.