Fabricated images of child pornography
Order Description
‘There are only morality-based rationales for criminalising fabricated images of child pornography.’
Critically discuss.
Style of Citation: OSCOLA
https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/publications/oscola
Suggested reading, child pornography:
(You are encouraged to read at least two of the following reading suggestions AND a selection of the newspaper articles.)
Adler, Amy 2001. ‘The Perverse Law of Child Pornography’, Columbia Law Review 101(2): 209-73 (an interesting critique of American law which is accessible electronically via Westlaw, or at
https://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/adler.htm
Gillespie, Alisdair A. 2011. Child Pornography: Law and Policy. Routledge. Library electronic copy available.
Gillespie, Alisdair A. 2005. ‘Child Pornography: Balancing Substantive and Evidential Law to Safeguard Children Effectively from Abuse’, International Journal of Evidence and Proof 9: 29-49.
Gillespie, Alisdair A. 2004. ‘The Sexual Offences Act 2003 (3) Tinkering With “Child Pornography”’ Criminal Law Review 361-68.
O’Riordan, Maurice 2008 (July). ‘Editorial: To Dream a Child’, Art Monthly 211. Available at: https://reader.exacteditions.com/issues/5107/page/5
J Prichard, P Watters and C Spiranovic, ‘Internet subcultures and pathways to the use of child pornography’ (2011) 27(6) Computer Law & Security Review, 585-600.
Ost, Suzanne 2009. Child Pornography and Sexual Grooming: Legal and Societal Responses. Cambridge University Press, chapters 3 and 4. Library electronic copy available.
Ost, Suzanne 2010. ‘Criminalising Fabricated Images of Child Pornography: A Matter of Harm or Morality?’, Legal Studies 30(2): 230-256.
Williams, Katherine S. 2004. ‘Child Pornography Law: Does it Protect Children?’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 26(3): 245-61.
Newspaper articles and BBC News reports on the Tierney Gearon, Nan Goldin and Polixeni Papapetrou photographs (if no link provided below, available via Nexis):
Legally Indecent?, The Times, 13 March 2001.
‘There’s nothing seedy about these pictures of my kids. They are not “child porn”. They are wholesome’, The Independent, 13 March 2001.
‘No Charges over Saatchi Photos’, The Guardian, 16 March 2001.
‘Encouraging evil’, Daily Mail, 16 March 2001.
‘The pics are okay…but I wouldn’t put them on view; Readers’ give verdict on nudes display’, The Mirror, 17 March 2001.
‘The notional paedophile now dictates what we can look at’, The Guardian, 4 October 2007. Available at: https://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/oct/04/comment.comment1
‘Naked fear on display’, The Times, 30 September 2007.
‘Art or abuse? Fury over image of naked girl’, The Independent, 8 July 2008. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/art-or-abuse-fury-over-image-of-naked-girl-
862068.html
‘Child abuse artist Graham Ovenden jailed for two years after ‘unduly lenient’ sentence is reviewed’, The Independent, 9th October 2013.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/child-abuse-artist-graham-ovenden-jailed-for-two-years-after-unduly-lenient-sentence-is-reviewed-8868358.html
Suggested reading, child sexual grooming:
(You are encouraged to read at least two of the following reading suggestions.)
Craven, Samantha, Brown, Sarah and Gilchrist, Elizabeth 2006. ‘Sexual Grooming of Children: Review of Literature and Theoretical Considerations’, Journal of Sexual Aggression 12(3): 287-99.
Gillespie, Alisdair A. 2006. ‘Indecent Images, Grooming and the Law’, Criminal Law Review 412-21.
McAlinden, Anne-Marie 2013. Grooming and the Sexual Abuse of Children (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Library electronic copy available.
McAlinden, Anne-Marie 2006. ‘“Setting ‘Em Up”: Personal, Familial and Institutional Grooming in the Sexual Abuse of Children’, Social and Legal Studies 15(3): 339-62.
Ost, Suzanne 2009. Child Pornography and Sexual Grooming: Legal and Societal Responses. Cambridge University Press, chapters 3 and 4. Library electronic copy available.
Wider reading:
M Long, L Alison, M McManus, ‘Child Pornography and Likelihood of Contact Abuse: A Comparison Between Contact Child Sexual Offenders and Noncontact Offenders’ (2012) 25 Sexual Abuse: A Journal of
Research and Treatment, 370–395 (NB the levels of child abuse imagery in the table on p.372 are no longer the levels used by the Sentencing Council (see the powerpoint lecture presentation from
week 4, slide 17).
E Quayle, S Allegro, L Hutton, M Sheath and L Lööf, ‘Rapid skill acquisition and online sexual grooming of children’ (2014) 39 Computers in Human Behaviour, 368-375.
M Seto, RK Hanson and KM Babchishin, ‘Contact Sexual Offending by Men With Online Sexual Offenses’ (2011) 23 Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 124–145.
Our Service Charter
-
Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-Free
We employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers. -
Free Revisions
We keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed. -
Confidentiality / 100% No Disclosure
We make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service. -
Money Back Guarantee
If the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit. -
24/7 Customer Support
We have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.