100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Tailored to your instructions

Order Now!

Branding Strategist for organisation in tourism and hospitality sector

Branding Strategist for organisation in tourism and hospitality sector
Order Description
Present your case study in a report format. Please ensure that you acknowledge ALL your sources of data and appropriately Harvard reference them. Please include the following in your report;
• A suitable title
• An executive summary-200 words (not included in the word count)
• An introduction-200 words
• Literature review-1500 words
• Discussion and analysis-1000 words
• Conclusion-100 words
• Recommendations- 200 words
• References and bibliography
• Appendix (use sparingly)
Assessment Criteria
The following marking scheme will be used for marking the assignment;
Introduction -coverage of the background of the topic and the organisation selected (10 marks maximum)
? Weak coverage with little or no justification: 1-3
? Satisfactory coverage with some justification: 4-7
? Good coverage with good justification: 8-10
Literature review -Collection of data from a range of sources (25 marks maximum)
? Little or no evidence of data: 1-9
? Satisfactory range of sources: 10-16
? Excellent range of sources: 17-25
Discussion and analysis -the analysis and evaluation of the case study (20 marks maximum)
? Weak analysis with little or no evaluation: 1-7
? Satisfactory analysis with some evaluation: 8-13
? Good analysis with good evaluation: 14-20
Conclusions – A critical evaluation of how the aim and objectives of the assignment were achieved (10 marks)
? Poor conclusions with little or no evaluation: 1-3
? Satisfactory conclusions which have evaluated how the objectives of the study were achieved : 4-7
? Good conclusions with a critical evaluation of the achievement of the aims and objectives of the study: 8-10
Recommendations – for management of case study about taking forward action in relation to the topic under consideration (15 marks)
? Poor recommendations with little or no explanation: 1-5
? Satisfactory recommendations with some explanation: 6-10
? Good recommendations with good explanation: 11-15
Presentation, argument and Harvard referencing (20 marks maximum)
? Poor presentation, poorly structured argument and poor Harvard referencing: 1-7
? Satisfactory presentation, logically structured argument and satisfactory Harvard referencing: 8-13
? Good presentation, logically structured argument and satisfactory Harvard referencing: 14-20
Level 7 Marking Criteria
Distinction 70%+ Pass (strong) 55-69% Pass (threshold +) 40-54% Fail 20-39% Fail 0-19%
of the academic discipline, field of study, or area of professional practice as 55-69 &
excellent coverage, offering sophisticated or original insights;
a synthesis, possibly, of disparate material. as 40-54 &
an awareness of problems & insights much of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of the discipline/practice. a systematic understanding of relevant knowledge;
good identification, selection and & understanding of key issues;
awareness of current problems &/or new insights;
conceptual awareness enabling critical analysis; accuracy in detail. Coverage of some relevant issues with moderate understanding; identification of some underpinning issues. paucity of relevant material in support of response
extensive, well-referenced research both in breadth & depth. as 40-54 &
a range in breadth or depth of well-referenced research a good range of reading, beyond core or basic texts, with sources appropriately acknowledged according to academic conventions of referencing. the range of reading may be limited;
sources not always explicitly or accurately acknowledged. inadequate resourcing &/or sources insufficiently acknowledged.
sophisticated evaluation of possibilities and limitations of methodologies used. as 40-54 &
a comprehensive & critical understanding of techniques applicable to the student’s own research. a practical understanding of how established techniques of research & enquiry are used to create & interpret knowledge in the discipline;
research work planned in scale and scope so that adequate and appropriate evidence is gathered. understanding of methodologies used but these may have been used to too little effect inadequate understanding of methodologies, used inappropriately or erroneously.
as 55-69 &
imaginative, insightful, original or creative interpretations;
impressive, sustained level of analysis & evaluation;
a cogent argument with awareness of limitations. as 40-54 &
a command of accepted critical positions;
conceptual understanding that enables the student to propose new hypotheses. the ability to deal with complex issues both systematically & creatively, & make sound judgements;
consistent analysis and critical evaluation of current research & advanced scholarship in the discipline;
a coherent argument supported by evidence. some ability to deal with complex issues;
judgements not all well substantiated;
some evaluation of research & scholarship;
the ability to construct an argument may be limited. analysis is limited, deriving from limited sources &/or too limited to a single perspective;
argument or position not made clear;
self-contradiction or confusion.
Authoritative, articulate communication demonstrating a balance of enthusiasm and control
as 40-54 &
Persuasive communication skills; the academic form largely matches that expected in published work clear expression, observing academic form;
(in written work) predominantly accurate in spelling & grammar;
conclusions communicated clearly for specialist & non-specialist audiences as appropriate. there may be errors in academic form and/or (in written work) spelling & grammar. poor observation of academic conventions;
deficiencies in spelling & grammar.
sophisticated critical self-evaluation;
new insights informing practical situations. as 40-54 &
decision-making in complex situations;
originality in addressing needs or specifications, and /or solving problems. collaborative or individual problem-solving, & planning & implementing of tasks appropriate to a professional context;
the independent learning ability and self-evaluation required to continue to advance the student’s knowledge & understanding, & to develop new skills appropriate to a professional context. some exercise of initiative & personal or professional responsibility but a limited self-evaluation weakness in independent learning, decision-making &/or self-evaluation.

Our Service Charter

  1. Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-Free

    We employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers.
  2. Free Revisions

    We keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed.
  3. Confidentiality / 100% No Disclosure

    We make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service.
  4. Money Back Guarantee

    If the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit.
  5. 24/7 Customer Support

    We have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.

Excellent Quality
Zero Plagiarism
Expert Writers

Custom Writing Service

Instant Quote
Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency (Less urgent, less costly):
Total Cost: NaN

Get 10% Off on your 1st order!