WE WRITE CUSTOM ACADEMIC PAPERS

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Tailored to your instructions

Order Now!

Appraising the Evidence

Appraising the Evidence
Order Description
The purpose of this paper is to interpret the two articles identified as most important to the group topic. ( Nurse staffing ratio ) That means your need to choose two articles that talks about nurse staffing ratio, and interpret the articles. am going to upload the guidelines for this paper. Note the references should be within five years.
Appraising the EvidenceGuidelines
PURPOSE
Thepurposeof thispaperistointerpretthetwoarticlesidentified asmostimportanttothegroup topic.
COURSE OUTCOMES
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs #4 and #8)
CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence- based practice. (POs #4 and #8)
DUE DATE
Referto the coursecalendar for duedate information.Thecollege’sLateAssignmentpolicyappliestothisactivity.
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE
150 POINTS
REQUIREMENTS
Thepaperwill includethefollowing.
1. Clinical question
a. Descriptionof problem
b. Significanceof problem
c. Purpose ofpaper
2. Descriptionof findings
a. Summarizebasicsin the Matrix Tableasfound in Assignment Documentsin e-College.
b. Describe
i. Concepts
ii. Methodsused
iii. Participants
iv. Instrumentsincluding reliability and validity
v. Answer to “Purpose”question
vi. Identifynextstep for group
3. Conclusionof paper
4. Format
a. Correctgrammar and spelling
b. Useof headingsforeach section
c. Useof APA format(sixthedition)
d. Pagelength:threepages
PREPARINGTHEPAPER
1. Pleasemakesure you donotduplicatearticleswithinyour group.
2. Paper should includeatitle page and a referencepage.
DIRECTIONS AND ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
Assignment Criteria Points % Description
Problem 20
13%
1. Problemisdescribed:Whatisthefocusofyourgroup’swork?
2. Significanceoftheproblemis described:Whathealthoutcomesresult fromyourproblem?Orwhatstatisticsdocumentthisisa problem?You mayfindsupporton websitesforgovernmentorprofessional organizations.
3. Purposeofyourpaper:Whatwillyourpaperdoordescribe?“The
purposeofthispaperisto . . .”
**Pleasenotethatalthough mostofthesequestionsare thesameasyou addressedin paper1, thepurposeofthispaperisdifferent.You can use yourworkfrompaper1foritems1 and2 above,including any suggestionsforimprovementprovided asfeedback. Item3 above should bespecifictothispaper.
Descriptionof
Findings: Summary
20
13% Summarizethebasicsofeacharticleina matrixtablethatappearsinthe appendix.
Descriptionof
Findings: Description 60 41% Describeinthebody ofthepaper the following.
• Whatconceptshavebeenstudied?
• Whatmethodshavebeenused?
• Whoaretheparticipantsormembersofthe samples?
• Whatinstrumentshavebeen used?Didtheauthorsdescribethe reliabilityandvalidity?
• Howdoyouansweryouroriginal“purposeofthispaper” question?Dothefindingsofthearticlesprovideevidenceforyour answers?If so,how?Ifnot,whatisstillneededtobeabletoanswer yourquestion?
• Whatisneededforthenextstep?Identifytwoquestionsthatcanhelpguidethegroup’swork.
Descriptionof
Findings: Conclusion 20 13% Conclusion:Reviewmajorfindingsinyourpaperina summary paragraph.
Format 30
20%
1. Correctgrammar andspelling
2. Useheadingsforeachsection:Problem,SynthesisoftheLiterature
(Concepts, Methods,Participants,Instruments,Implicationsfor Future Work),Conclusion.
3. APAformat(sixthed.): Appendicesfollowreferences.
4. Paperlength:Threepages
Total 150 100%
GRADING RUBRIC
Assignment Criteria Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance
A (92–100%) Very Good or High Level of Performance
B (84–91%) Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance
C (76–83%) Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
F (0–75%)
Problem
(20points)
Includesallelementsina manner thatisclearlyunderstood.
•Problemdescriptionprovides focusofthegroup’swork.
•Significanceoftheproblemis clearlystatedandsupportedby currentevidence.
•Purposeofpaper is clearlystated.
19–20points
Missingonlyoneelement
OR
Oneelementisnotpresented clearly
•Problemdescriptionprovides focusofthegroup’swork.
•Significanceoftheproblemis clearlystatedandsupportedby currentevidence.
•Purposeofpaper isclearlystated.
17–18points
Missingtwoelements
OR
Oneelementisnotpresented clearly
•Problemdescriptionprovides focusofthegroup’swork.
•Significanceoftheproblemis clearlystatedandsupportedby currentevidence.
•Purposeofpaper is clearlystated.
16points
Missingtwoor moreelements
AND/OR
Oneor moreelementsarenot presentedclearly
•Problemdescriptionprovides focusofthegroup’swork.
•Significanceoftheproblemis clearlystatedandsupportedby currentevidence.
•Purposeofpaper is clearlystated.
0-15points
Descriptionof Findings: Summary
(20points)
Summaryomitsnomorethan onerequireditemfromthe EvidenceMatrixTable.
19–20points
Summaryomitstwoorthree requireditemsfromtheEvidence MatrixTable.
17–18points
Summaryomitsfourrequired itemsfromtheEvidenceMatrix Table.
16points
Summaryomitsfiveor morerequireditemsfromtheEvidence MatrixTable.
0–15points
Descriptionof Findings: Description (60points)
DescriptionincludesALLelements.
•Whatconceptshavebeen studied?
•Whatmethodshavebeen used?
•Whoaretheparticipantsor membersofthesamples?
•Whatinstrumentshavebeen used?Didtheauthorsdescribethereliabilityand validity?
•Howdoyouansweryour original“thepurposeofthis paper”question?Dothe findingsofthearticlesprovide evidenceforyouranswers?If so,how?Ifnot,whatisstill neededtobeabletoanswer yourquestion?
•Whatisneededforthenext step?Identifytwoquestions thatcanhelpguidethe group’swork.
56–60points
Descriptionmissingnomorethan oneelement.
•Whatconceptshavebeen studied?
•Whatmethodshavebeen used?
•Whoaretheparticipantsor membersofthesamples?
•Whatinstrumentshavebeen used?Didtheauthors
describethereliabilityand validity?
•Howdoyouansweryour original“thepurposeofthis paper”question?Dothe findingsofthearticlesprovide evidenceforyouranswers?If so,how?Ifnot,whatisstill neededtobeabletoanswer yourquestion?
•Whatisneededforthenext step?Identifytwoquestions thatcanhelpguidethe group’swork.
51–55points
Descriptionmissingnomore thantwoelements.
•Whatconceptshavebeen studied?
•Whatmethodshavebeen used?
•Whoaretheparticipantsor membersofthesamples?
•Whatinstrumentshavebeen used?Didtheauthors
describethereliabilityand validity?
•Howdoyouansweryour original“thepurposeofthis paper”question?Dothe findingsofthearticlesprovide evidenceforyouranswers?If so,how?Ifnot,whatisstill neededtobeabletoanswer yourquestion?
•Whatisneededforthenext step?Identifytwoquestions thatcanhelpguidethe group’swork.
46–50points
Descriptionmissingthreeor moreelements.
•Whatconceptshavebeen studied?
•Whatmethodshavebeen used?
•Whoaretheparticipantsor membersofthesamples?
•Whatinstrumentshavebeen used?Didtheauthors
describethereliabilityand validity?
•Howdoyouansweryour original“thepurposeofthis paper”question?Dothe findingsofthearticlesprovide evidenceforyouranswers?If so,how?Ifnot,whatisstill neededtobeabletoanswer yourquestion?
•Whatisneededforthenext step?Identifytwoquestions thatcanhelpguidethe group’swork.
0–45points
Descriptionof Findings: Conclusion
(20points)
SummaryparagraphincludesALLmajorfindingsfromarticle.
• Independentlyextractscomplex datafromavarietyof quantitativesources,presents thosedatain summaryform, makesappropriateconnections andinferencesconsistentwith thedata,andrelatesthem toa largercontext.
• Recognizespointsof viewand valueassumptionsin formulatinginterpretationof datacollectedandarticulates thepointofviewina given situation.
• Identifiesmisrepresentationsin thepresentationof
quantitativedataandthe
logicalandempiricalfallaciesin inferencesdrawnfromdata.
SummaryparagraphomitsONEmajorfindingfromarticle.
• Independentlyextractscomplex datafromavarietyof quantitativesources,presents thosedatain summaryform, makesappropriateconnections andinferencesconsistentwith thedata,andrelatesthem toa largercontext.
• Recognizespointsof viewand valueassumptionsin formulatinginterpretationof datacollectedandarticulates thepointofviewina given situation.
• Identifiesmisrepresentationsin thepresentationof
quantitativedataandthe
logicalandempiricalfallaciesin inferencesdrawnfromdata.
SummaryparagraphomitsTWOmajorfindingsfromarticle.
• Independentlyextractscomplex datafromavarietyof quantitativesources,presents thosedatain summaryform, makesappropriateconnections andinferencesconsistentwith thedata,andrelatesthem toa largercontext.
• Recognizespointsof viewand valueassumptionsin formulatinginterpretationof datacollectedandarticulates thepointofviewina given situation.
• Identifiesmisrepresentationsin thepresentationof
quantitativedataandthe
logicalandempiricalfallaciesin inferencesdrawnfromdata.
SummaryparagraphomitsTHREE or MOREmajorfindingsfrom article.
• Independentlyextractscomplex datafromavarietyof quantitativesources,presents thosedatain summaryform, makesappropriateconnections andinferencesconsistentwith thedata,andrelatesthem toa largercontext.
• Recognizespointsof viewand valueassumptionsin formulatinginterpretationof datacollectedandarticulates thepointofviewina given situation.
• Identifiesmisrepresentationsin thepresentationof
quantitativedataandthe
logicalandempiricalfallaciesin
Grammar, Spelling, Mechanics, and APAFormat
(30points)
•Lengthisthreefullpages.
•UsedappropriateAPAformat andis freeoferrors.
•IncludesALLheadingsand subheadingsasinstructed.
•Grammar,spelling,and mechanicsarefreeoferrors.
28–30points
•Length is nomorethanone quarterpageunderorover.
•UsedappropriateAPAformat, withonetypeoferror.
•IncludesALLheadingsand subheadingsasinstructed.
•Grammar,spelling,and mechanicshaveonetypeof error.
26–27points
•Lengthisnomorethanonehalf pageunderorover.
•UsedappropriateAPAformat, withtwotypesoferrors.
•IncludesALLheadingsand subheadingsasinstructed.
•Grammar,spelling,and mechanicshavetwotypesof errors.
23–25points
•Lengthisthreequartersofa pageor moreunderorover.
•AttemptsmadetouseAPA format;threeor moretypesof errorsarepresent.
•IncludesALLheadingsand subheadingsasinstructed.
•Grammar,spelling,and mechanicshavethreeor more typesoferrors.
0–22points
Total Points Possible = 150 points

Our Service Charter

  1. Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-Free

    We employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers.
  2. Free Revisions

    We keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed.
  3. Confidentiality / 100% No Disclosure

    We make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service.
  4. Money Back Guarantee

    If the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit.
  5. 24/7 Customer Support

    We have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.

Excellent Quality
Zero Plagiarism
Expert Writers

Custom Writing Service

Instant Quote
Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency (Less urgent, less costly):
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost: NaN

Get 10% Off on your 1st order!